Is the CEO really the best crisis spokesperson?

What to say in a crisis and who should say it?  Those two questions can determine whether  an organization’s reputation is enhanced or irreparably damaged when things go wrong.

Answering those questions also exposes four myths about crisis management.

Myth # One: Only the CEO can speak for the organization
The CEO absolutely should be visible and speak when there is a crisis, especially to demonstrate compassion and commitment to action.  But that is very different from being the one and only “official spokesperson.”

Former BP boss Tony Hayward provides a stark reminder of what happens when the CEO becomes the 24/7 spokesman, providing continuous updates on all operational detail, which allows the media to personalise every tactical setback.  The BP case also highlights that not every senior executive has the skills and personality to carry the whole burden of crisis communication.

Myth # Two: There must be only one spokesperson
The second myth links to the first and emerges from the basic misunderstanding that “speaking with one voice” means only one person should speak.
One voice means consistency of message, not just one spokesperson. Indeed, it is sometimes a real advantage to have a number of different spokespersons, especially when it comes to detailed technical or operational areas. The key to success in a crisis is not the number of spokespersons, but having one voice – calm, consistent and confident.

Myth # Three: Legal counsel should determine what gets said
While legitimate legal risks cannot be ignored, these must be weighed against other considerations such as financial, competitive and customer risk, as well as risk to reputation.

It is well recognised that lawyers intuitively err on the side of caution and may advise little or no comment. But it is also well known that an organization can win in the court of law and lose in the court of public opinion. As Professor Daniel Diermeier says: “Good crisis management teams have a strong, opinionated general counsel, while poor crisis management teams are run by the general counsel.”

Myth # Four: The CEO must be on the spot to take charge
This myth is the most contentious, because it raises an almost unanswerable question. In fact American crisis expert William Small says no other issue has been debated as much as the role of the CEO in the first few hours, and whether or not he or she should race to the scene.

The CEO certainly needs to be visible during a crisis but that does not necessarily mean being on the spot to drive the operational response. This is a balance leaders can easily get wrong. After the Bhopal disaster in 1984, Union Carbide Chairman Warren Anderson impetuously flew to India and was promptly arrested, leaving the company leaderless at a critical time. By contrast President George Bush famously failed to visit New Orleans immediately after Hurricane Katrina.

Should the CEO go to the scene of a crisis? Usually the answer is yes, even if for no reason other than to be visible and show they care. But it is a myth to think there is a simple, definitive answer.

For more information about the CEO as crisis spokesperson see my article in the latest issue of CEO magazine.

About managingoutcomes

Issue and crisis management expert
This entry was posted in Crisis management and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.